data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90d1e/90d1e121ee307bf6098e7efafdd6af38be7c795d" alt=""
Turns out that the vandal toyed with only two Wiki articles and, like Snagglepuss, exited Stage Right, never to return. I inaugurated the vandal's assigned Wiki talk page and added a less than subtle warning to behave in the future. If he ever returns to the scene and launches a new campaign against the 1950's or any other topic, he'll soon have tried Wiki's patience and he'll be on the outside looking in.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ba5f/9ba5fee83dd0967734f33e073c878b9506502050" alt=""
My friend lamented the article's deficiencies but then passed an equivocal judgment on Wiki, saying,"See why I'm skeptical about that do-it-yourself portal of knowledge? :-) Though I know it does have lots of useful & accurate material in it. I make use of it myself, but know how to approach it with some caution. There's just not enough editorial supervision to prevent such nonsense as the above being put in."
He knows there can be errors in it, but he uses it anyway, but with a degree of caution. I couldn't have said it better myself.
I found some hope in his closing remarks that suggest he'll someday accept his duty to become a Wiki editor. You might see darkness, but I see some light working its way in. "Guess I should write in a correction, but I doubt that I will. It's not my project. "
No comments:
Post a Comment